Like, for instance, this jackass. He set out, a while back, to prove to the world that the only thing that matters in a weight-loss regimen is the math: burn more calories than you take in. So he cut his daily caloric intake to 1,800. Most of which he obtained through, apparently, Twinkies, Doritos and Oreos. And yes, he lost weight.
To his credit he’s apparently been able to keep it off. But here’s why the point he “proved” is a slap in the face to people trying to manage their weight responsibly: Some of us, Dr. Haub, can’t eat just one. And let’s face it, if your total caloric intake is less than 2,000 calories, you ain’t gonna get many Twinkies. One (1) Twinkie is 150 calories – and they come packs of two, which means somebody with less-than-perfect will-power is going to consume 300 calories when they open a package of Twinkies.
I don’t know if you’ve ever eaten a pack of Twinkies, but I have to tell you, they aren’t particularly filling. He says he ate one every three hours, plus other snacks. Let’s say he started at 9 AM and ate one every three hours through 9 PM. That’s 750 calories, and nearly nothing in his stomach. Let’s say he added two handfuls of Doritos every day. That’s another 280 calories.
Maybe he added a couple of Oreos and a bowl of Honeycomb cereal just to round-out the days snacking. There’s 310 more calories. Which leaves 460 calories for the protein shake and vegetables he says he consumed.
A reasonable person isn’t FULL after eating that amount of food. It rings the calorie register too quickly, and there’s no bulk, no satisfaction to the “meal.”
Perhaps he’s one of those rare folks who can eat a couple of Oreos and just walk away. Or perhaps I’m the strange one. But here’s what happens when I eat an Oreo: I eat another Oreo. And then another and another. And then I start looking around to be sure nobody sees the fat guy eating the next ten or fifteen Oreos. And you know what? I think there are more of me than there are of him.
As I referenced in this post, there’s actual research to back up my point that bad food is engineered to make you want more bad food. So this guy is effectively telling people – many of whom are desperately trying to get healthy – that there’s no difference between an all-Twinkies-all-the-time approach and the Michael Pollan approach. But there is.
Yes, he tries to back off from it by saying he doesn’t know what the right answer is. Really? Seriously? You think the right answer has anything to do with Doritos? That’s simply disingenuous, and worse, it’s harmful. Because I’ll promise you there’s somebody reading the CNN article about him and thinking, “Alright! I CAN eat junk food and lose weight.” And a year from now that person is going to blame themselves, and not this jackass. And that’s inexcusable.
—
Two housekeeping items: First, I’m stuck at 262. That’s 25 pounds in 25 weeks. Gotta pick up the pace or I’ll be OFF pace … and that won’t be good.
Second, see those little pictures of the Facebook, Twitter, Google and other icons? Click those. Share the blog if you enjoy it. Thanks!
Skipping Dessert 